※ 引述《spacehunt (( ‵д′)～獵人)》之銘言：
: ※ 引述《lxb (lxb)》之銘言：
: : 3977 有乜特別?
: : 977 其實該被很多 rfc 或 non-standard 去修修改改吧,
: : 大執一次也是好事, 問題是 3977 的 core 跟 977 有甚麼
: : 分別.
: o A formal syntax specification (Section 9) has been added.
這個早就該有, 爭在 formal 左之後會唔見乜野, 會死乜野.
: o The default character set is changed from US-ASCII [ANSI1986] to
: UTF-8 [RFC3629] (note that US-ASCII is a subset of UTF-8). This
: matter is discussed further in Section 10.
好事.
: o All articles are required to have a message-id, eliminating the
: “<0>” placeholder used in RFC 977 in some responses.
冇 id 簡直是萬惡之源.
: o The newsgroup name matching capabilities already documented in
: RFC 977 (”wildmats”, Section 4) are clarified and extended. The
: new facilities (e.g., the use of commas and exclamation marks) are
: allowed wherever wildmats appear in the protocol.
呢個複雜點喎. 而家有乜 nntpd 是可以立即跟足？
應該不少吧?
: o Support for pipelining of commands (Section 3.5) is made
: mandatory.
good.
: o The principles behind response codes (Section 3.2) have been
: tidied up. In particular:
: * the x8x response code family, formerly used for private
: extensions, is now reserved for authentication and privacy
: extensions;
大好事.
: * the x9x response code family, formerly intended for debugging
: facilities, are now reserved for private extensions;
這個會很亂.
: * the 502 and 503 generic response codes (Section 3.2.1) have
: been redefined;
: * new 401, 403, 480, 483, and 504 generic response codes have
: been added.
我關心的是怎做 distributed managing, anti spaming 之類.
: o The rules for article numbering (Section 6) have been clarified
: (also see Section 6.1.1.2).
: o The SLAVE command (which was ill-defined) is removed from the
: protocol.
抵死.
: o Four-digit years are permitted in the NEWNEWS (Section 7.4) and
: NEWGROUPS (Section 7.3) commands (two-digit years are still
: permitted). The optional distribution parameter to these commands
: has been removed.
到底幾時可以兼容火星歷？
唔係講笑的, 我係覺得有需要 plan 定.
只懂跟地球的 time frame 恐怕不出廿年就會出問題.
: o The LIST command (Section 7.6.1) is greatly extended; the original
: is available as LIST ACTIVE, while new variants include
: ACTIVE.TIMES, DISTRIB.PATS, and NEWSGROUPS. A new “m” status flag
: is added to the LIST ACTIVE response.
好喎
: o A new CAPABILITIES command (Section 5.2) allows clients to
: determine what facilities are supported by a server.
SIP 化?
: o The DATE command (Section 7.1) is adopted from RFC 2980
: effectively unchanged.
呢個同上, 我真係覺得咁樣 (指停留在地球 timeframe) 係短視.
: o The LISTGROUP command (Section 6.1.2) is adopted from RFC 2980.
: An optional range argument has been added, and the 211 initial
: response line now has the same format as the 211 response from the
: GROUP command.
正常到爆.
: o The MODE READER command (Section 5.3) is adopted from RFC 2980 and
: its meaning and effects clarified.
同上.
: o The XHDR command in RFC 2980 has been formalised as the new HDR
: (Section 8.5) and LIST HEADERS (Section 8.6) commands.
好重要的.
: o The XOVER command in RFC 2980 has been formalised as the new OVER
: (Section 8.3) and LIST OVERVIEW.FMT (Section 8.4) commands. The
: former can be applied to a message-id as well as to a range.
同上.
: o The concept of article metadata (Section 8.1) has been formalised,
: allowing the Bytes and Lines pseudo-headers to be deprecated.
坦白講, 看到這裏我覺得仍有很多東西應有而未有.
不知道像 DarkKiller 之類的大網管有甚麼看法. (他們早該有想法吧?)
–
※ 發信站: 香港地(hkday.net)
◆ From: 210.17.203.190
