剛剛在 bbs chat 板追舊文﹐翻到了 這個怪東西！

當然﹐重點是去看「為甚麼要這樣搞」的一頁﹐略舉其中幾點：

kFreeBSD
- Support for NDIS drivers in the mainline kernel. On Linux, NdisWrapper is unlikely to make it into the mainline kernel.
- Some people say that kFreeBSD has better performance and/or stability (especially in disk/filesystem areas).
- Possible support for ZFS in the mainline kernel. Due to license and patent issues, ZFS is unlikely to appear on Linux.

Debian
- If you don’t have anything against GPL or other copylefted free software licenses, you’ll appreciate that useful kernel modules like ext2fs driver, the upcoming reiserfs and xfs, or the upcoming ethernet driver for Xbox are (or will be) compiled in on the default kernel.
- If you like GNU userland more than BSDish one (again, just a matter of preference).

對我來說 Gnu Userland 意味著大部份本地會碰 運 *nix 的人。BSD style 對於他們來說的確是個門檻。而我更無疑問是個 Hybrid ﹐兩樣一齊用有何不好？

結論：Good thing to try out